Fundamentals of Financial Management Speech or Presentation

Fundamentals of Financial Management - Speech or Presentation Example tio has decreased in 2010 standing at 1.9:1 and as compared to the last year which was 2.5:1 and the quick ratio which is 0.69:1 in 2010 as compared to 1.09:1 in 2009, but the other ratios shows the company has improved a lot in managing its financial position as well as performance from that of last year. Current Ratio – A current ratio measures the relationship of current assets with current liabilities. This is used to analyze the solvency of a firm. Higher current ratio measures the firm’s higher rate of solvency. Acid-Test Ratio (Quick Ratio) - This ratio is used to analyze the liquidity position of a company. It helps an organization to meet the short term obligation with the liquid assets it has. A firm is evaluated to be in better condition when the quick ratio is higher. Average Age of Receivables – While reviewing a firm’s financial health this is important because it is compared to the credit and collection policy and the industry in which the firm operates. It is countable in terms of days. The analysis shows better result if number of days is higher. Inventory Turnover Ratio – This ratio shows number of times the inventory of a company is being sold and replaced over a certain period of time. Generally a low turnover indicates bad sign for a company. Times Interest Earned – This is a tool that is used to measure an ability of a company to meet its obligations that is related to debt. If any company fails to meet its obligations then it will be in a position of bankruptcy (Ramachandran & Kakani, 2007). Changes can occur in both the ways, positive or negative. The reason behind the lower current ratio and acid test ratio can be similar and that is cash shortage. Basically the poor credit policy and the collection process of the company can be blamed for higher average age of receivables. Again an inventory turnover ratio implies that the company must have a tight control over the purchasing and simultaneously it also refers that due to

Seigel v. Merrill Lynch Case Analysis Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Seigel v. Merrill Lynch Analysis - Case Study Example As a matter of fact, Seigel was obliged to make these payments anyway. There was no reason for him to stop making these payments. It is also a fact that he had given instructions to Merrill Lynch to stop payment against the checks issued by him to the casinos against gambling chips. However, the court ruled that since Seigel had not suffered any actual loss and the checks were payments rightfully made in view of his gambling dues, Merrill Lynch could not be convicted for any wrong doing. Prima facie, Merrill Lynch erred in not adhering to the instructions to stop payments against the checks. It was a mistake on the part of Merrill Lynch to pass the checks after having received instructions from their client, Seigel, to stop making payments against these checks. In fact, Merrill Lynch did stop payments against many checks issued to the casinos by Seigel. However, they did not fully adhere to instructions and cleared certain checks amounting to $143,000 issued by Seigel to these casinos. The court's view that since Seigel abrogated his rights to these monies after losing them to the casinos, he could not seek legal reprieve even if Merrill Lynch had overlooked his instructions to stop payment against these checks appear proper and fair.